“The progeny of two humans is always a human. That’s just biology.”
I just read a post from Helvidius, a Pachyderm including the quote above by theobromophile its owner. You should check it out. I was going to post a comment and decided that I wanted to expand my comment to a post of my own. I had been doing some research for just this occasion and here it is:
Since I have been examining the question of abortion since 1967 it seems that the basic question comes to the “personhood” of the “baby,” “Fetus,” “Embryo,” or “Zygote” as you may please. There has been much discussion (though you don’t hear those on the left using this much any longer) as to the “viability” of the fetus as it relates to when an unborn child has “personhood” and thus protected by the laws of man and has the civil rights that its humanness affords it.
Thomas Aquinas has summed it up the best as far as I am concerned. He said that when an action is to be taken it is incumbent on the actor to establish its morality in advance. In this case, determining when human life or personhood begins is incumbent on the person that would take the moral action, otherwise, according to what Aquinas said, that person must follow the “morally safer” course. In the case of Abortion it is the responsibility of the “pro abortion” crowd to prove that human life does NOT exist and therefore the law of society and the civil rights of the individual do not come to bear. Since I have never heard any evidence that disproves the personhood at conception or otherwise establishes personhood at a later date, this moral dictum applies to the would be abortionists and would serve to stop that action, otherwise the result would be “immoral.” This Thomistic Principle is a long held and understood mandate that has also been understood by others beside me. Allow me to quote some of them:
“the legalization of abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our civilization places on human life.” Ted Kennedy 1973
“abortion is morally wrong. It is not a legitimate or acceptable response to any problem of society. And if our country wishes to remain true to its basic moral strength, then unwanted as well as wanted children must be unfailingly protected.” Ted Kennedy 1976 after the decision on Roe v. Wade
“It is my deep personal conviction that abortion is wrong, “Let me assure you that I share your belief that innocent human life must be protected ……” Al Gore 1984
“arguably the taking of a human life.” “It is my deep personal belief that abortion is wrong.” Al Gore 1984
he still regarded abortion as the taking of “innocent human life” Al Gore 1992
There are others that are now not only “pro-abortion” as opposed to when they spoke of abortion being wrong in the past but also consider the pro-lifers to be some type of Neanderthal type of beings. What changed that made them so learned and the rest of us so stupid. It is hard to determine exactly why they have changed their views so militantly, but it should be noted that there is a common pattern between this change and their aspiration for “national political office.”
You have heard attacks from the left and the media concerning certain Republican candidates that have switched their position to “pro life” as though it is some type of crime, all while they are conspicuously quite about these flips flops from pro life to pro abortion. Thanks to Neil at 4 Simpsons Blog for the Fetus Graphic above.